Differentiate restricted-use pesticides from general-use pesticides.

• A. Restricted-use require certification and may only be applied by licensed applicators; general-use pesticides can be purchased and used by non-licensed individuals if used according to label.
• B. Restricted-use can be bought by anyone; general-use requires certification.
• C. Both require licensing.
• D. General-use cannot be used for homes.

Answer: (A)

The distinction here revolves around risk and training requirements. Restricted-use pesticides are designated because they pose higher risks to people, pets, non-target organisms, and the environment, so their use is limited to certified applicators who have completed the required training and certification. In many cases, only licensed applicators can apply them, and sales may also be restricted to those with certification. General-use pesticides are considered lower risk and are available to the general public; they can be purchased and used by non-licensed individuals as long as the label directions are followed, since the label provides the safety, application, and disposal instructions.

That’s why this option is the best fit: it correctly states that restricted-use require certification and licensed applicators, while general-use can be purchased and used by non-licensed people if they follow the label. The other statements don’t align with typical regulatory practice: restricted-use aren’t freely purchasable by everyone, general-use doesn’t require certification, both don’t always require licensing, and general-use can be used in homes.